• In 2007, Singapore’s info com industry saw its revenues grow 13.8 per cent to S$51.7 billion. The hardware segment was the largest contributor, at 55 per cent, followed by software (17 per cent) and IT services (12 per cent).
  • There are more than 130,000 info-comm industry professionals in Singapore. Of this, more than 80 per cent have at least a tertiary education.
  • Singapore is home to more than 80 of the top 100 software and services companies. Many of them, including the top 15 software companies, have regional or Asia Pacific headquarters here

FACTS ABOUT ENGINEERING INDUSTRY-SINGAPORE

 

  • The Engineering Services industry currently accounts for about 1.2 per cent of Singapore’s gross domestic product and employs about 35,000 people.
  • Nine of the world’s top 10 Control & Automation companies already have significant operations here, making Singapore the leading process control hub in Asia.
  • Singapore hosts a growing number of global engineering design firms. One recent addition is M+W Zander Facility Engineering which established its global HQ in Singapore to better reach out to the Chinese, European and US markets. It is also the first German engineering design company to set up a global HQ here.

FACTS ABOUT LOGISTICS AND SUPPLY CHAIN MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY-SINGAPORE

  • Singapore hosts 21 of the 25 largest third party logistics companies in the world. Most of them have also set up regional headquarters in Singapore. Companies that have established regional distribution centres in Singapore include Hewlett Packard, LVMH, Numonyx, Roche Diagnostics and Schering-Plough.
  • Singapore is the world’s busiest port and is the largest transshipment hub. It is also the world’s top bunkering port. Over 200 different shipping lines with daily sailings to every major port in the world call at Singapore.
  • Singapore’s Changi Airport is Asia’s fifth largest cargo airport. It is served by 78 airlines with over 4000 flights connecting to more than 180 cities in 59 countries.
  • Asia’s leading logistics education and research institute, The Logistics Institute – Asia Pacific, is based in Singapore and has more than 100 alumni. Since 2003,TLI Asia Pacific has been conferred Asia’s Best Education Course Provider for six consecutive years at Cargonews Asia’s annual Asian Freight & Supply Chain awards.
  • Singapore is ranked 7th in the world and 2nd in Asia for having the most motivated workforce (Source: IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2009)

  • Singapore offers the best skilled labour in Asia Pacific (Source: IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2009)

  • Singapore is ranked 1st in its Labour Market (Source: BERI 2009 Labour Force Evaluation Measure report)

  • Singapore is ranked 1st in the Credibility of its Managers (Source: World Competitiveness Yearbook 2007)

  • Singapore is the world leader in foreign trade and investment (Source: The Globalisation Index 2009)

  • Singapore is ranked first for having the most open economy for international trade and investment (Source: The Global Enabling Trade Report 2009, World Economic Forum)

  • Singapore is the world’s easiest place to do business (Source: Doing Business 2010 Report, World Bank)

  • Singapore’s workforce comprises over 60 nationalities 35% of Singapore’s workforce is of international origin Foreign talent rank Singapore as Asia’s best country to work in (Source: IMD World Competitiveness Yearbook 2009)

  • Singapore has consistently clinched the top spot in international labour rankings.

  • Singapore is rated the best place in Asia to live, work and play (Source: Mercer, Quality of Living Global City rankings 2009)

Population would jump 219% if people could migrate anywhere: Poll

BY LI XUEYING POLITICAL CORRESPONDENT

SITTING within booming Asia yet armed with the creature comforts of a developed economy, Singapore is tops as a migration
destination for the young and educated. It is the only economy in developed Asia – which includes Japan, South Korea,
Hong Kong and Taiwan – that would not suffer a brain drain if people around the world can migrate anywhere they want, according
to a poll by research firm Gallup.
In fact, Singapore would have four times its current number of educated adults, defined as those with at least a bachelor’s degree. Even greater would be the jump in the number of those aged between 15 and 29: It would rise six times – a silver lining for a rapidly ageing population.
These results emerge from the answers of 350,000 adults in 148 countries who were asked whether they, if given the opportunity,
would like to move permanently to another country, and if so, where. Overall, Singapore’s population would burgeon by 219 per cent, from its current 5 million to 15 million, leapfrogging it to the top of Gallup’s Potential Net Migration Index. The index is calculated by subtracting the number of people who want to move out of a country from those who want to move in. Singapore is followed by New Zealand, Canada and Switzerland.
But the results come with two caveats. One, it measures aspirations, not intentions. Two, Singapore’s small population means the impact of migration shifts is magnified. For instance, one million people eyeing Singapore would make a huge difference to its population, compared with say, the population of 300 million in the United States. The report did not give the absolute net
number of people who would want to migrate into – or out of – each country.
But a comparison with countries of similar population sizes shows Singapore faring well. Hong Kong, with seven million people, would lose 28 per cent of its educated people and 5 per cent of its young people. Norway, with five million people, would see its educated group increase by just 15 per cent. Research fellow Leong Chan Hoong of the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS), who
studies migration patterns, posited that Singapore’s good showing is due to its strategic location within Asia.
“Asia, being a dynamic region, is attracting young, talented people hungry for success. And Singapore – compared with Japan and South Korea – is known as a place where we speak English, is safe, and has a good education system.” The results also debunk the conventional view that Singapore attracts families, while Hong Kong gets the young and single professionals. Dr Leong attributes it to
branding strategies that market Singapore as a dynamic destination.
“With greater investment in arts and entertainment, from the Esplanade to the integrated resorts, and numerous food and
cultural festivals, Singapore is now more vibrant with attractive lifestyle offerings to global talent.”
Indeed, the idea that Singapore “has all the benefits of the West but is still within Asia” makes it alluring for Canadian Albert Tseng. The 36-year-old has two master’s degrees and is based in South Africa as a programme manager for the non-profit Clinton Foundation.

He said his first choice is his own country, but in Asia, Singapore is a top option. “It is a door to Asia, which has plenty of opportunities, and at the same time, all the benefits – English-speaking, safety, peace of mind – of the West,” he said. The only downside is Singapore’s relatively high cost of living, he added.  Said demography expert Yap Mui Teng, also of IPS: “The cost of living, the pace of life, et cetera, will not be so attractive to those with less income.” Singapore’s lower score on the overall
migration index compared with the indexes for the educated and young suggests that it holds relatively less shine for other
groups, like retirees.
xueying@sph.com.sg

The scholarship includes:

  • Tuition fees for the PhD program for up to 3.5 years
  • Living costs of up to AU$15,000 per annum

A paid teaching assistantship may also form part of the scholarship.

Who should consider applying for the scholarship?

Graduates interested in undertaking research in Semester 1 or Semester 2, 2011 in one of the following four broad areas of research:

  • Information Storage, Analysis and Retrieval
  • Intelligent Systems
  • Software Engineering
  • Distributed Systems and Networking

Applicants are encouraged to explore these research fields and nominate the area(s) in which they are interested.

What are the selection criteria?

  • Academic requirements
  • Applicants should have graduated with First Class Honors or equivalent (E.g. a GPA of at least 3.5 out of 4) from a reputable University
  • English language requirements
• IELTS of 6.5 + with no band less than 6.0
• TOEFL Paper based 580+ (TWE 4.5+) or TOEFL iBT Overall score 92, minimum 20 in all sections

Expression of interest:

  • The School will require applicants to email certified copies of all academic documents (in PDF format). These should include individual transcripts /mark sheets and completion certificates for any degrees being undertaken or completed
  • Resume/CV
  • Any research publications that the applicant may have undertaken.

These may include one of or a combination of the following:

• Published works of academic standing such as honors research thesis

• Masters by research thesis

• Journal articles

• Internationally refereed conference paper

Applicants must submit official English translations of all documents in other languages. All of the above documents must be emailed to register@siecindia.com

At this stage no formal PhD research proposal is required.

DEADLINE FOR EXPRESSIONS OF INTEREST:

30 November 2010 for commencement in Semester 1, 2011

15 May 2011 for commencement in Semester 2, 2011

THE SELECTION PROCESS:

Step 1:

Upon receipt of a complete set of documents towards an Expression of Interest, all applicants will be supplied with a research paper and asked to provide written answers to a set of questions relating to this paper.

Step 2:

Students, who successfully fulfill requirements in Step 1, will need to undertake a Skype interview (via webcam) with staff from the School of Computer Science and IT at an agreed time.

Step 3:

Successful applicants will be connected with potential supervisors to explore the topic(s) within their chosen area. When an agreement between applicant and potential supervisor has been reached, applicants will be directed to proceed with a formal application via the official RMIT application process.

Indian school principals will hold talks to heal Australia’s reputation

Australia has the chance to reset its reputation in the eyes of 10 influential Indian school principals who will travel here this month for meetings with the higher education sector.

Sponsored by Austrade, the visit is part of ongoing efforts to mend bridges after last year’s student attacks, which have contributed to a worrisome downturn in tertiary enrolments and commencements from India.

Austrade national education manager Quentin Stevenson–Perks blamed erroneous and sensationalised media reports within India for the damage. He said the visit would allow opinion leaders to observe the safety and quality of Australian campuses for themselves.

“The story that’s reported in Australia is not often the story that’s reported overseas,” Stevenson–Perks said.

“If we can dispel some of the misconceptions and misreporting that are influencing some of our key markets overseas, then this is a valuable step forward.”

The 12-day visit is the brainchild of the Sonya International Education Centre (SIEC), a higher education agency that has long represented Australia in India.

The principals, who come from schools across the subcontinent, will meet with TAFE directors and university representatives from La Trobe, Swinburne, the University of Western Sydney and University of Technology, Sydney, among others.

Universities Australia and the safe community unit of the Victorian police also will hold talks with the delegation.

“Upon their return, the principals will be able to share their first-hand experience with their students and fellow teachers and, with support from SIEC, can encourage them to take up further education in Australia,” managing director Sonya Singh said in a statement.

Stevenson–Perks said Indian school principals played a critical role in healing Australia’s reputation within that country, because they were “seen as leaders in their communities, and their views and comments are taken very strongly by parents and the students themselves”.

Student violence and subsequent protests last May in Melbourne and Sydney are widely blamed for a 15 per cent drop in Indian student enrolments and a 16 per cent drop in commencements measured this July compared to July 2009.

About 26,000 fewer Indian students were granted visas to study here in 2009-10 than the previous year, representing a 52 per cent downturn.

The slump has caused anxiety within the sector, which relies on India as its second largest source of international students after China.

Those fears were likely discussed during high-level ministerial talks last August between India’s external affairs minister SM Krishna, and then-education minister Julia Gillard, who promised such talks would continue annually. Higher education was the subject again in April, when Gillard met with the Indian minister for human resources, Kapil Sibal, on his visit to Australia.

There’s no doubt misconceptions of Australia as a dangerous and hostile environment for Indian students are contributing to the decline in student numbers.

However, Professor Lesleyanne Hawthorne, associate dean international with the University of Melbourne, said other factors were to blame, too, including a strong Australian dollar and especially changes to Australia’s skilled migration rules.

Research shows the skilled migration pathway into Australia has been popular with Indian students for a long time. And they perform exceptionally well, with more than 90 per cent who enter as skilled migrants achieving employment here.

But Hawthorne said the new laws meant most skilled migrants now required employer sponsorship, placing Indian students under deeper scrutiny in terms of their grades and English language skills.

She said all factors combined, Australia’s international student market would continue to see a decline from India for the next two years. It was not yet clear whether universities or the VET sector would be hardest hit.

However, she said Australia remained a “very good deal” for international students compared to the UK and the US, both of which were shrinking student pathways to migration. She forecast Indian student numbers would bounce back here.

“They will learn the new rules, they will see the options still exist … and after the kind of shake out that’s certain to occur in the next couple of years, my prediction would be that many of them will reposition again with a pathway that will lead to migration,” said Hawthorne.

Likewise, Australia’s negative publicity in India – which had unfairly smeared the nation’s entire tertiary education system – would correct itself through incremental steps, such as the upcoming visit by the school principals’ delegation, she said.

“These kinds of problems do not get corrected overnight,” said Hawthorne.

“I understand people in India have been really very afraid for the personal safety of their family members or friends located in Australia.

“Even if there is assurance given that the risk of danger is extremely slight, and by some reports is actually lower than will be experienced by a variety of other people, it takes time and a margin of safety before people really believe what they’re told.”

A group of 10 Indian school principals will visit Australia this month to find out why our education system has been a draw card for international students.

The principals, from all over India, will visit Melbourne and Sydney during their 12 day tour to take in the best that the Australian education sector has to offer.

The tour, organized by Spirit of  International Education  & Careers (SIEC), an education and consulting firm in India, aims to promote the benefits and rewards of an Australian education, our work culture and the Australian way of life.
SIEC Managing Director, Sonya Singh said, “This visit provides an opportunity for the school principals and the education providers to learn more about each other’s education systems.

“Upon their return, the principals will be able to share their first-hand experience with their students and fellow teachers and with support from SIEC, can encourage them to take up further education in Australia.

“This is a great way for information and knowledge to be exchanged between India and Australia,” Ms Singh said.
Whilst in Australia, the group will meet with representatives of universities in Sydney and Melbourne, TAFE directors, Department of Innovation, Industry and Regional Development (DIIRD) Melbourne, Universities Australia, Austrade Melbourne, and the Safe Community Unit of Victorian Police.

Austrade’s National Education Manager, Quentin Stevenson-Perks said, “Austrade took on the responsibility of marketing and promotion of Australian international education on 1 July 2010. We are supporting this tour to enhance education links between Australia and India. The visit will result in future opportunities like study tours, student and faculty exchanges and pathway programs.

“Austrade has assisted by arranging in-market briefings with quality education providers. It will be an invaluable chance for these providers to showcase how unique an Australian education is,” Mr Stevenson-Perks said.

“Australia is a very popular choice for international students because of the high quality of learning we can provide. This visit highlights the strong relationship Australia and India share,” he said.
The group arrives in Melbourne on 26 September, 2010. The tour runs through to 7 October, 2010.

The Indian schools involved are:
RIMS International, Mumbai
• MIT Vishwashanti Gurukul, Pune
• Sharad Pawar International School, Pune
• Ahlcon Public School, Delhi
• Scottish High International School, Delhi
• Convent of Jesus and Mary, Delhi
• St. Columba’s School, Delhi
• KVM (Kundan Vidya Mandir), Punjab
• BCM (Bahadurchand Munjal Arya Model Senior Sec School), Punjab
• St Francis Junior College, Hyderabad

The English language, which arose from humble Anglo-Saxon roots to become the lingua franca of 600 million people worldwide and the dominant lexicon of international discourse, is dead. It succumbed last month at the age of 1,617 after a long illness. It is survived by an ignominiously diminished form of itself.

The end came quietly on Aug. 21 on the letters page of The Washington Post. A reader castigated the newspaper for having written that Sasha Obama was the “youngest” daughter of the president and first lady, rather than their “younger” daughter. In so doing, however, the letter writer called the first couple the “Obama’s.” This, too, was published, constituting an illiterate proofreading of an illiterate criticism of an illiteracy. Moments later, already severely weakened, English died of shame.

The language’s demise took few by surprise. Signs of its failing health had been evident for some time on the pages of America’s daily newspapers, the flexible yet linguistically authoritative forums through which the day-to-day state of the language has traditionally been measured. Beset by the need to cut costs, and influenced by decreased public attention to grammar, punctuation and syntax in an era of unedited blogs and abbreviated instant communication, newspaper publishers have been cutting back on the use of copy editing, sometimes eliminating it entirely.

In the past year alone, as the language lay imperiled, the ironically clueless misspelling “pronounciation” has been seen in the Boston Globe, the St. Paul Pioneer Press, the Deseret Morning News, Washington Jewish Week and the Contra Costa (Calif.) Times, where it appeared in a correction that apologized for a previous mispronunciation.

On Aug. 6, the very first word of an article in the Winston-Salem (N.C.) Journal was “Alot,” which the newspaper employed to estimate the number of Winston-Salemites who would be vacationing that month.

The Lewiston (Maine) Sun-Journal has written of “spading and neutering.” The Miami Herald reported on someone who “eeks out a living” — alas, not by running an amusement-park haunted house. The Fredericksburg Free Lance-Star described professional football as a “doggy dog world.” The Vallejo (Calif.) Times-Herald and the South Bend (Ind.) Tribune were the two most recent papers, out of dozens, to report on the treatment of “prostrate cancer.”

Observers say, however, that no development contributed more dramatically to the death of the language than the sudden and startling ubiquity of the vomitous verbal construction “reach out to” as a synonym for “call on the phone,” or “attempt to contact.” A jargony phrase bloated with bogus compassion — once the province only of 12-step programs and sensitivity training seminars — “reach out to” is now commonplace in newspapers. In the last half-year, the New York Times alone has used it more than 20 times in a number of contextually indefensible ways, including to report that the Blagojevich jury had asked the judge a question.

It was not immediately clear to what degree the English language will be mourned, or if it will be mourned at all. In the United States, English has become increasingly irrelevant, particularly among young adults. Once the most popular major at the nation’s leading colleges and universities, it now often trails more pragmatic disciplines, such as economics, politics, government, and, ironically, “communications,” which increasingly involves learning to write mobile-device-friendly ads for products like Cheez Doodles.

Many people interviewed for this obituary appeared unmoved by the news, including Anthony Incognito of Crystal City, a typical man in the street.

“Between you and I,” he said, “I could care less.”

E-mail Gene at weingarten@washpost.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.